BLINK NETWORK (Ecotality) Possible Bankruptcy

Toyota Rav4 EV Forum

Help Support Toyota Rav4 EV Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mhkp

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
117
Location
Simi Valley, CA
http://files.shareholder.com/downlo...1437749-13-10447/1301206/1437749-13-10447.pdf

The link above is to a Form 8-K filed by Ecotality today. ECTY is trading at $0.29. The company's market cap is now $7.5 million.

The filed form is full of interesting reading , including the melting EVSE connectors. Ecotality lower the power pushed through to limit heat.

Personally I hope another company picks up the assets so we can continue using the existing EVSE network (assuming they are fixed).
 
mhkp said:
..........................

Personally I hope another company picks up the assets so we can continue using the existing EVSE network (assuming they are fixed).

Yes, I do too. I have a Blink Card and found some of their EVSEs to be conveniently located. It wouldn't be too hard for someone like Charge Point to make a deal to swap out the blinks for Coulomb EVSEs since the infrastructure is already there. I go to meetings several times a month in Carson and there are two Blinks that give me convenient parking. The meetings are on the campus of Harbor UCLA Medical Center and parking can be tough, but these spaces are almost always available.
 
Ampster said:
mhkp said:
..........................

Personally I hope another company picks up the assets so we can continue using the existing EVSE network (assuming they are fixed).

Yes, I do too. I have a Blink Card and found some of their EVSEs to be conveniently located. It wouldn't be too hard for someone like Charge Point to make a deal to swap out the blinks for Coulomb EVSEs since the infrastructure is already there. I go to meetings several times a month in Carson and there are two Blinks that give me convenient parking. The meetings are on the campus of Harbor UCLA Medical Center and parking can be tough, but these spaces are almost always available.


Have you found that the Blink units charge at the RAV 4 EV rate?
 
bruin nut said:
.............

Have you found that the Blink units charge at the RAV 4 EV rate?

I honestly don't know. I can't poll them like I can the Charge Point EVSEs so I can't easily find out. In only one case did I need the charge to get home and it was at the Blink for 4 hours and I got more than the 30 miles I needed to get home.
 
Virtually all public EVSEs are 30 amps, either at 208 or 240 volts.

Our Tesla charger onboard the Rav4 EV can pull up to 40 amps.

Ecotality / Blink began reducing the power to 17 amps so that it would not melt to our cars, like happened to me.

My letter to Ecotality March 2012:

It is time for the respective government agencies to ENFORCE the provisions of your government contracts. If your company cannot fulfill them, there are others who can. Government funds need to be frozen until such time as the terms of the contract are met, or those funds given to another company or companies who can successfully complete and comply with the terms of the government funding.

http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?p=183008#p183008

March 19, 2012

U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20585

Recovery Act Inquiries:

1-888-363-7289

[email protected]


REFERENCE:

US Department of Energy Grant Award # EE0002194
Grant Award Date: Sep 30, 2009
Grant Award Amount: $100,196,560.00
Funds Invoiced and Received to date: $33,154,158
Grant Recipient:
Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation
aka: Ecotality (publically traded company ETLY.OB)
aka: Blink Network
aka: The EV Project

430 South Second Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85003-2418

Point of Contact:
Thomas Garetson
[email protected]
602-345-9020


Madam or Sir,


I am a resident, citizen and tax payer in San Diego, California. I would like to formally complain about the repeatedly and continuously failed electric vehicle charging stations that have been installed by the above referenced grantee under the U.S. Government's "American Recovery Act" funding over the past year.

These "Blink" charging stations have routinely been troublesome and inoperative. The grantee has been advised many times of these repeated failures over the past year, yet they continue to persist.

It is not acceptable that the government issue public fund to companies that provide substandard products. Please see the following letter sent to the grantee's customer service department concerning a specific site owned by the City of San Diego, where the grantee installed electric vehicle chargers that routinely fail. The City of San Diego Mayor's office point of contact for this site is Jaques Chirazi <[email protected]>.

Of course, there are many other electric vehicle installation locations done by the grantee that also have similarly failed equipment for long periods of time. Electric vehicle charging equipment that has been installed in my house by the grantee, and paid for with funds from this grant, has also failed numerous times. Besides failing to actually charge a car on occasion, it also fails to send any data, since last year, to the grantee to be compiled for Dept of Energy use, per the grant. Many, many other recipients of "Blink" equipment report unsatisfactory service, also.

The grantee is woefully behind it's timelines to complete the goals of the grant, and provides shoddy equipment when it provides any at all. Please enforce the terms of your agreement with the grantee, and force the grantee to provide quality, functioning equipment, collect data, and meet all the terms of the agreement. If the grantee is unable or unwilling to do this, I recommend that the appropriate steps be taken to alleviate these concerns.


Thank you,

Anthony Williams
Anywhere Street
San Diego, CA 92128

858-xxx-xxxx

**********************************************************

From: Tony Williams <TonyWilliams AT LoveMyLeaf dott com>
Date: March 18, 2012 1:54:44 AM PDT
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: One Year of Failed Electric Car Charging Stations

Blink Network Contact Center
e: [email protected]
d:+1.888.998.2546

Dear Ecotality / Blink Network,

Today, I drove my Nissan LEAF electric car to the City of San Diego's Balboa Park, where the first 10 of your company's Blink EVSE's (commonly referred to as chargers) were installed almost one year ago. In the time since their installation, I have used those chargers many times, and in that time, there has routinely been a failure of one or more units.

When these units were installed last summer, there were 100 Nissan LEAFs in all of San Diego, in addition to a small number of other cars that could use the chargers. Now, there are almost 1000 Nissan LEAFs and over 200 Smart electric vehicles from Car2Go fighting for these spots, in addition to other electric vehicles like the Chevrolet Volt and Mitsubishi iMiev .


When I plugged in today, I was not surprised to see another charger failure in Balboa Park. What struck me as odd is that almost a year after their installation, 40% of the Blink chargers on this day had obvious failures. I didn't test the remaining 60% to actually verify that they would work, but its a reasonable guess that not all of those would work either.

So, I called your customer service, as I have done many times previously to report failed Blink chargers in Balboa Park, and spoke to one of your representatives. She listened to me bemoan what she already knew. She verified that there are outstanding service tickets, and that your company was working to "fix" these chargers. She went on to suggest that the San Diego area power outage that happened on September 9, 2011 (over six months ago) was somehow to blame. In addition, she said that electrical "noise" needed to be filtered out at the site, and that the Blink membership card readers (RFID) were somehow interfering with the SD card memory chip. It sure sounds like a lot of issues.

Just to be clear, these units at Balboa Park routinely failed long before the single power outage of 2011. I can only imagine how poorly they would handle places where winter power outages are somewhat routine. If they are so poorly designed to not be able to withstand a simple power outage, that is itself a huge problem.

Here's the overall problem. It doesn't take a year to fix these problems. After a breathtaking amount of taxpayer money that has been spent by the US government (your company has drawn over $30 million of the $100 million in DOE grant money for electric vehicle chargers) and money spent by the City of San Diego to have these chargers, they should all work now. If you cannot somehow make your units work, and that clearly is the case, then within a few hours, you should have a working replacement installed. Or your company could use one of your competitor's EVSE's / chargers mounted and operational that can now be purchased in retail locations all over San Diego, including Lowes and Home Depot. Or eBay. Or overnight shipped from California manufacturer Clipper Creek, whose units are the standard of durability.

It is not unprecedented that your company use a Clipper Creek CS-40 model electric vehicle charger to replace one of your failed units. This has been done by your company with residential customers in the past who also have failed Blink chargers in their homes. Your recent DC quick charger installations in Oregon did not include your Blink units, either, but instead are DC quick chargers from competing company AeroVironment, even though your company reported building and shipping 61 of your Blink DC quick chargers in fourth quarter 2011 (as reported to the government).

After almost a year of continuous, documented, repeated failures, it's time for an intervention. I am, today, notifying the appropriate government agencies involved in this unfulfilled government contract. Your failed chargers neither charge cars, nor report the data of their charging, which is also your contracted task per the DOE specifications.

No technician was at the Balboa Park site repairing or replacing these units yesterday, or today, and most likely won't be tomorrow either. It is time for the respective government agencies to ENFORCE the provisions of your government contracts. If your company cannot fulfill them, there are others who can. Government funds need to be frozen until such time as the terms of the contract are met, or those funds given to another company or companies who can successfully complete and comply with the terms of the government funding.

I don't expect a response from your company that these units at Balboa Park will be operational on Monday, like they could be. Or Tuesday. Or Wednesday.

Since it is a relatively simple task for a technician to replace these units in minutes to hours, from any number of available sources, I'll check each day until Wednesday to see if they are operational.

Then, should they not be, I intend to contact the various news sources like Fox News, that would love nothing more than to get a story of "fleecing America" with yet another failed government program. Failed programs with solar or electric cars seem to be quite popular now. We can explore a wide range of issues related to your company's performance with regards to not only durability of your products, but also timelines as to the numbers of chargers deployed, et al.

I hope the best for you and your company, both now, and after the DOE money has ended.

Sincerely,

Tony Williams
San Diego

CC:
*San Diego Developed Regional Parks Division
*San Diego Mayor’s Economic Growth Services
*U.S. Department of Energy

********************************************
 
It's high time we had a big shakeup in the charging sphere. Thanks for your vigilance, Tony. Most of the chargers in Phoenix are Blinks, so we pretty much never charge the RAV away from home, but then we don't really need to.

The sad likelihood is that business owners won't replace the Blinks, leaving dead units to rot in the sun, same as the AVCON chargers have done around town. More worrisome are the L3 chargers, and there are lots of them here. A lot of Leaf owners could really be screwed here.
 
jspearman said:
The sad likelihood is that business owners won't replace the Blinks, leaving dead units to rot in the sun, same as the AVCON chargers have done around town. More worrisome are the L3 chargers, and there are lots of them here. A lot of Leaf owners could really be screwed here.

Nobody is going to pay to have the DC chargers replaced. They will rot, and eventually sold for 1700 pounds of scrap metal.

Most of the remaining L2 stations will also flounder. The only hope is a deep pocket crazy enough to fix it all... and that US government crazy pocket already got fleeced.

Somebody will buy the whole thing in bankruptcy for pennies on the dollar, but the doesn't mean that they will maintain them.
 
bruin nut said:
...

Have you found that the Blink units charge at the RAV 4 EV rate?

Uh. I get $0/hr. You could imagine the fight to those parking spaces. :lol:

My workplace uses Blink.

Blink is still installing them this week. In fact, 20 more just powered up this week. 12 today.
 
dipper said:
My workplace uses Blink.

Blink is still installing them this week. In fact, 20 more just powered up this week. 12 today.
This is the kind of commercial work that Ecotality (Blink) wanted to do so that they could become profitable. However, there are many good reasons that employers like Apple and Google go with ChargePoint instead.
 
Saw in a news posting a few hours ago that Blink was going to further limit the charging rate on their EVSE's to prevent melting. Just a few minutes ago, I received the below survey request from Blink:

"Hello Sean,

We are looking for the RAV4 EV drivers in our community. If you do not have a RAV4 EV, you can stop reading now.

If you do have a RAV4 EV, Blink wants to learn more about your charging experience. We need your input to ensure that you can continue to have a reliable charging experience.

Please fill out this short form and let us know the year of your RAV4 EV. We promise to only take a few minutes of your time.

Charge On.
Blink"
 
TonyWilliams said:
dipper said:
Blink is still installing them this week. In fact, 20 more just powered up this week. 12 today.

And the government froze their payments... so... maybe they think that they can get this reversed? Why else would they keep working?
It must be a commercial installation where the host site is paying for everything without government support.
 
This Blink survey sounds like CYA (Cover Your Ass) in prep for BK filing. They need to say that they reached out to affected customers and tried to remedy the situation. Sounds like a legal department directive to me.

You might see a white knight situation here where someone(financial play) steps in at last moment to grab assets before they are available in a BK auction. BUT, sounds like Ecotality is a toxic company, so it would have to be a very specific carve out so as not to get burdened with all the lawsuits that are sure to come (including possible federal investigations).
 
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/...ker-Ecotality-files-for-bankruptcy-protection

September 18, 2013 at 10:44 am
EV charging systems maker Ecotality files for bankruptcy protection

Associated Press

New York — Ecotality, which makes charging systems for electric vehicles, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and wants to sell its assets in an auction.

Ecotality Inc. said it made the filing Monday in Arizona. The company had said in August that it might be forced into a sale or bankruptcy filing after disappointing sales and a suspension of payments from the federal government. It has also paid $855,000 in back wages and damages to resolve an investigation by the Department of Labor into allegations that the company broke labor laws.

The San Francisco company makes charging and power-storage systems for electric vehicles under the Blink and Minit Charger brands, including charging stations for the Nissan Leaf. It also does testing for government agencies, auto makers and utilities.

Ecotality wants to sell its assets through a bankruptcy auction, which the bankruptcy court must approve. The company also said Nissan will allow it to borrow as much as $1.3 million. The court will also review that proposed loan.



From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130918/AUTO01/309180070#ixzz2fGi2oEmD
 
Back
Top