Toyota's Campaign of Misinformation Against EVs

Toyota Rav4 EV Forum

Help Support Toyota Rav4 EV Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Tony, I know somewhere on this forum you posted the value of building various types of compliance vehicles. If I recall the H2 cars had the equivalency of 9 units in comparison to the EV vehicles that have a value of 3. So from just a purely cost/benefit basis it is probably worth while for Toyota to have some of the cost associated with H2 vehicles covered by Government. Since they are just in the process of starting I don't think it would be wise for them to suggest other than a rosy future for H2 cars. However, once it is all done then I think we should take a look at what they really think with respect to energy efficient vehicles. For those of us with EVs and solar systems we think Heaven found its way to our home. We don't need to rethink EV versus H2. I thought the comments coming from Nissan about weight and size as a determinant of either a EV or a Plug-in was interesting. Our Rav4EV is a bit heavier than their cutoff of 3800 lbs., however given the short development timeframe I believe the Rav4EV came out pretty good. I am still thinking of the Mitsubishi Outlander PREV for our next vehicle, as I want something with the size of the Rav4EV and capable of longer distances.

Here is an April 2014 UK Mitsubishi Review

The 148mpg Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. Except, of course, it isn’t, because nobody, not least Mitsubishi itself, truly believes anyone is going to achieve the economy recorded on the regulations-enforced NEDC test cycle.

But even with a healthy dose of realism installed, this is still a mid-sized, five-seat, large-booted, plug-in hybrid 4x4 that can achieve up to 32.5 miles on electric charge alone (an 80 per cent charge is possible in 30 minutes), and one which is estimated will be more economical to run than the equivalent 2.2-litre diesel Outlander for the majority of people travelling around 100 miles between charges.

It goes without saying that the potential range and economy will vary depending on the types of roads and driving style, but it’s still a decent indication of the benefits of the plug-in hybrid system, which switches between a 2.0-litre petrol motor and two electric motors according to needs.

Throw in the fact that the Mitsubishi emits an official 44g/km of CO2 – and therefore only attracts a five per cent benefit-in-kind tariff and is London congestion charge free – and the sums could start to add up in your favour.

Beyond that, anyone familiar with the Mitsubishi Outlander will know the drill: the only significant differences are a minor increase in weight due to the floor-mounted battery pack, a reduction of 14 litres of boot space and slightly less space for your feet in the rear, where the floor has risen to accommodate the batteries.


What is it like?

Climb aboard and the first thing that strikes you is the quality of the cabin. It’s not perfect in some of the darker, less-exposed corners of the car, but Mitsubishi has made a stride in terms of perceived quality. Beyond that there are dials and graphics that let you know this is an electric car, but nothing that shouts out about it.

Battery charged, the Outlander starts silently and stays eerily quiet for as long as you have charge – providing the car calculates that it is the best way to be using energy. On full throttle the 80bhp electric motors – the back one producing peak torque of around 144lb ft and the front 101lb ft – can power the car from 0-62mph in 11.0sec, and they can, and often do, remain unassisted by the engine beyond 70mph.

The result, and it is a common trait among all electric vehicles, is an impressively refined drive. What’s more, Mitsubishi has done a decent job of quelling, if not suppressing, the road and wind noise that become more apparent without the masking of engine noise.

What’s more, when the 12kWh lithium ion batteries are depleted and the engine kicks in, acting either as a generator for the batteries or to drive the front wheels directly, it does so seamlessly and almost imperceptibly.

The driver can also press a button to force the battery to hold a certain level of charge, or use the petrol engine to charge the battery back to 70 per cent of its capacity. It's ideal for saving battery power either for zero-emission driving in town, when towing or anticipating extensive 4x4 usage.

Another neat touch is the ability to set the level of energy regeneration under braking. There are five levels to choose from, with each selected either by a tug of the gear-style lever or on the steering-wheel-mounted paddles. It takes some getting used to, but once you're in the swing of the system it's quick and easy to adjust according to road conditions and allows you to chase maximum efficiency.

The Mitsubishi's ride quality is also reasonable. Our test route took in some seriously pock-marked roads which revealed the Outlander to be set firm but capable of absorbing the worst of every bump.

Body control is decent for a car of this size, too, while the steering is uninvolving but wholly dependable. Mitsubishi’s S-AWC system, first developed for the Mitsubishi Evo, is fitted as standard, and effectively controls power distribution, yaw, stability and ABS control.

It can’t overcome physics – you can never escape the fact that this is a big car with a big battery pack in it, even if weight distribution is rated at 55 per cent front, 45 per cent rear – but the Outlander feels secure and dependable. For most owners its capabilities will be more than adequate.


Should I buy one?

Order books have just opened, with prices for the PHEV starting at £28,249. That's including the government's £5000 EV grant, but is impressive because it means Mitsubishi isn't charging a premium over its diesel models for hybrid technology. This is also a car without rivals on the market, because no other 4x4 offers the same breadth of technology or abilities.

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

Price £28,249; 0-62mph 11.0sec; Top speed 106mph; Economy 148mpg; CO2 44g/km; Kerb weight 1810kg; Engine type 4 cyls, 1998cc, petrol motor/generator plus two electric motors; Installation petrol engine and one AC motor front, one AC motor rear, 4WD; Power 200bhp (est); Torque 249lb ft (est); Gearbox Direct drive (AC motors), with gear train transmission for ICE engine (parallel hybrid mode only)
 
More proposed changes to promote hydrogen over battery electric:

It has been proposed to reduce the CA BEV rebate to $2000 (from the current $2500) for Fiscal Year 2014-2015, which starts on July 1, 2014.

CA ARB will consider the funding plan on June 26. More info here

http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aqip/fundplan/fundplan.htm

The wait list gets paid the existing $2,500 (p34) before it drops to $2000 for the rebate
FCEVs rebate to start at $5,000 (p37,38)
Rejected options such as income and msrp are on page 38

The staff (CARB) is proposing to limit lifetime rebates to two for individuals, retroactive. However, they're also proposing an exemption for anyone who wants to upgrade to an FCEV but has otherwise maxed out their rebates (pg. 39). Also, as a contingency measure to keep from running out of money, they suggest giving the Executive Officer "the ability to reduce or eliminate rebates for some PHEVs based on all-electric range, if necessary, to help align expected demand with remaining budgetary constraints" (pg. 40).
 
drmanny3 said:
Tony, I know somewhere on this forum you posted the value of building various types of compliance vehicles. If I recall the H2 cars had the equivalency of 9 units in comparison to the EV vehicles that have a value of 3.



"BMW, Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes, Nissan, Toyota, and Volkswagen must comply with the new requirements. Four additional manufacturers would also be required to comply with the ZEV requirements, but would be allowed to meet their obligation with PHEVs."

For 2012-2014, 12% of production must meet Yearly ZEV requirements (including ZEV's, Enhanced AT PZEVs, ATPZEVs and PZEVs). Of that 12%, 0.79% must be ZEV.

Any type of ZEV may be used

Type V - 300+ miles range "hydrogen" ---- Credit per vehicle: 9**
Type V - 300+ miles range "fast refueling" - Credit per vehicle: 7
Type IV - 200+ miles range "fast refueling" - Credit per vehicle: 5
Type III - 100+ miles range "fast refueling" - Credit per vehicle: 4
Type III - 200+ miles range -------------- Credit per vehicle: 4
Type II - 100+ miles range --------------- Credit per vehicle: 3
Type I.5 - 75-100 miles range ----------- Credit per vehicle: 2.5
Type I - 50-75 miles range --------------- Credit per vehicle: 2

** hydrogen credit at 9 per vehicle for model years 2015-2017 only

After 2017, the credits for Type III, IV and V drop to 3

All manufacturers must report by May of the calendar year following the compliance model year; e.g., for 2008 model year, report is due may 1, 2009. Manufacturers may update reports until September. Manufacturers have two years to make up a ZEV deficit, or they are subject to penalties outlines in Health and Safety Code 43211:

$5000 penalty per vehicle CREDIT not produced.
 
Back
Top